|
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Do tights = pants?
Lovingly posted by
Elle
at
10:35 AM
Luxe Labels: Jennifer Hudson, Tyra Banks, Would You Wear It?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An irreverent blend of celebrity style, fashion finds, beauty news and my life...in the fab lane!
|
Lovingly posted by
Elle
at
10:35 AM
Luxe Labels: Jennifer Hudson, Tyra Banks, Would You Wear It?
Powered by Blogger.
5 cupcakes had this to say:
EWWWW!
Camel toes are G-R-O-S-S!
Longer shirt, skirts, dresses and leggings = cute. Booty, thighs, and all that hanging out = negative, unless you have been hitting the squat rack and are well-sculpted in the lower body area (such as mois.....LOL. Killer hamstrings I have).
Only if they wear a leotard over them, by the way, that used to be my "play clothes" between the ages of 7-10. Nothing made me happier than frolicking around the house in my ballet tights and matching leotard...I felt so free!
But these bitches old enough to know better.
NOOOO!!!!
Both of these looks are just wrong! I think leggins are cool under tunics and such, but not as a substitute for pants by any means.
IMO tights do not = pants! Damn all this camel toe!
No and no. Camels are giving the middle finger all up in through allthose pics.
Post a Comment