Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Do tights = pants?

The divalicious JHud was spotted at LAX on Monday looking comfy and ready to take flight in her travel wear, and she reminded me of a question Nylon Magazine posed in it's Young Hollywood Issue (May 2008). Are leggings to be worn in lieu of pants? Are tights alright as more than an undergarment?


Tyra clearly thinks so. Oh and Mary Kate, Ashley and Lindsay have pretty much decided to wear leggings in lieu of pants from now until henceforth. As much as I am a fan of tights and leggings under long tops or short skirts, the whole phenomenon of wearing them as pants makes me uneasy. IMO, it's just too much information.
fasdf

What do you think? Are leggings as pants totally bohemian chic? Or should these women be fined for the crime of cameltoe?
asdfas

P.S. There's a whole website dedicated to stopping the movement of tights as pants, check it out here...

Source

5 cupcakes had this to say:

Dee said...

EWWWW!

Camel toes are G-R-O-S-S!

Longer shirt, skirts, dresses and leggings = cute. Booty, thighs, and all that hanging out = negative, unless you have been hitting the squat rack and are well-sculpted in the lower body area (such as mois.....LOL. Killer hamstrings I have).

Mese said...

Only if they wear a leotard over them, by the way, that used to be my "play clothes" between the ages of 7-10. Nothing made me happier than frolicking around the house in my ballet tights and matching leotard...I felt so free!

But these bitches old enough to know better.

Queen of My Castle said...

NOOOO!!!!

Both of these looks are just wrong! I think leggins are cool under tunics and such, but not as a substitute for pants by any means.

Anonymous said...

IMO tights do not = pants! Damn all this camel toe!

Marleaux said...

No and no. Camels are giving the middle finger all up in through allthose pics.

Shop Women's Shoes at Heels.com. Free Shipping!